brunhiddensmusings:

idjitmonkey:

intelligentchristianlady:

What a wonderful initiative! Spread the word.

holy shit, spread this like wildfire guys before November 

one of the biggest and most devious tools being used against voters now is that voting locations for lower income neighborhoods and neighborhoods that are primarily black or hispanic are suddenly closed down, in the middle of nowhere, or only open for 4 hours a day

do whatever you can to help negate that being a barrier

atrperro:

nakedsilver:

habemus-sea:

nakedsilver:

nakedsilver:

Latinoamérica de mi corazón, cuándo vas a ser la tierra con la que sueña tu gente?

if you’re brazilian and LGBT i can help you move to Argentina. its not the best, but its what i can do

everyone share this around for brazilian lgbt people who want to become a refugee in argentina. tell them to contact me (love#3592 on discord) if they need more information.

relacionesinternacionales@lgbt.org.ar 011-4338-4900 int.8106 ó 0800-999-3722

Mandar un mail a: defensoria@lgbt.org.ar

O buscanos en FB y TW: @defensorialgbt

TO MOVE TO ARGENTINA SAY A MEMBER OF ZONA LA PLATA SENT YOU THIS INFO TO BECOME A REFUGEE

Heey, this is sweet, but you don’t need to become a refugee to live legally in Argentina if you’re Brazilian! It’s the easiest country to move to for Brazilians and the whole process to obtain a DNI (the Argentinian national identity) takes 90 days and you get a 2 year visa, which you can later turn into a permanent residency visa without much trouble. It’s very affordable, we don’t even need to translate the documents thanks to a bilateral agreement and you don’t have to prove you have a job lined up for you or anything. Unless Brazil leaves the Mercosur, there’s no need to go so far as to ask for refuge if you choose Argentina as your destination.

thank you so much for your addition! reblog this please

if you plan to do this, id suggest you do it as quickly as possible, because its been said bolsonaro wants to leave mercosur

matt-the-blind-cinnamon-roll:

wereallalittle-mad:

zazzybuttcheeks:

plur-panda:

aw shit get it wednesday

HA! I almost forgot to reblog this today 

Every Wednesday from now on. 

Its wednesday yo

this never comes on my dash at the right time anymore 😦 i think i went two weeks without it and now i’m reblogging it on a thursday

GOD DAMN YES FINALLY BLOGGED IT ON A WEDNESDAY

AND IT’S HALLOWEEN

If you could get a complete history a la Fire and Blood about any other House, what would you want it to be?

goodqueenaly:

That’s a good question. I think one difficulty in writing a similar history is that while the Targaryen history (at least, the Targaryen history while the Targaryens were in Westeros) is comparatively short (the century or so they spent on Dragonstone after the Doom, and the three subsequent centuries ruling from the Iron Throne), the same cannot be said for the rest of the great Houses of Westeros. Even for those families raised to paramount status after the Conquest (e.g. the Tyrells and the Tullys), they were still known families of some status for thousands of years before Aegon the Conqueror stepped foot ashore Blackwater Bay. That would in turn make any history either very long or focused only on a smaller handful of rulers, as opposed to every member of the House from each one’s founding – less detail than I suspect we will get in the volumes of Fire and Blood.

That’s true, but if one were to just pop into existence and you got to choose which house it was, which house would you want it to be? Mostly I’m interested in what you’d want to see rather than whether its actually plausible that it would be written.

korrasera:

cooltrainerzero:

prochoice-or-gtfo:

smitethepatriarchy:

cyprinodont:

terfslying:

Have you seen this post going around and thought, wow the terfs might actually have decent sources?

I was a bit curious about this bizpacreview site. So I looked into it.

Note specifically it says that the bizpacreview site has failed fact checks. So I looked into the actual pediatric college claim it cites.

So uhh yeah seems like terfs are at it again with either a) not giving a fuck about if a source is valid or not, or b) being intellectually dishonest.

American College of Pediatricians is literally an anti-gay “socially conservative” think tank, not a “leading group of pediatricians”. 

From their website:

“In summary, tradition and science agree that biological ties and dual gender parenting are protective for children. The family environment in which children are reared plays a critical role in forming a secure gender identity, positive emotional well-being, and optimal academic achievement. Decades of social science research documents that children develop optimally when reared by their two biological parents in a low conflict marriage. The limited research advocating childrearing by same-sex parents has severe methodological limitations. There is significant risk of harm inherent in exposing a child to the homosexual lifestyle. Given the current body of evidence, the American College of Pediatricians believes it is inappropriate, potentially hazardous to children, and dangerously irresponsible to change the age-old prohibition on same-sex parenting, whether by adoption, foster care, or reproductive manipulation. This position is rooted in the best available science.“

Feminist Icons. 

Do TERFs ever miss a chance to jump in bed with horribly bigoted conservatives?

My conservative anti-feminist mother loves to share their “research” because their name sounds academic and fancy. This woman has a master’s degree.

Look into the sources you’re citing. Not all are created equal. Having a nice academic sounding name does not make you a reputable source of unbiased information.
-V

That’s exactly why they were created. They’re a fake organization named intentionally to be confused with the real one.

That’s why they exist.

Just FYI, the
American College of Pediatricians

was founded because a bunch of conservative bigots left the American Academy of Pediatricians in protest because they thought it was wrong to let gay couples adopt children.

It’s a think tank founded by bigots specifically to promote a bigoted agenda.

Lots of bigoted groups create academic sounding journals whose content is nothing but bunk that’s been long ago discredited or otherwise disagreed with by most actual experts. Holocaust deniers created one too – the Journal of Historical Review. Sounds legit right? Yeah, no, most experts regarded it as ahistorical, antisemitic bull puckey. 

That’s also how the term ‘historical revisionism’ went from something actually useful (a fresh look at history from a new, potentially valid, perspective based on evidence) to something derided (bald faced making shit up, often to support a bigoted conclusion).

northstarfan:

6stronghands:

Election Tampering is happening

Don’t vote straight tickets, don’t just select Democrat. Do each choice individually. People voting straight tickets in Texas caught the machines changing Beto votes to Cruz, while leaving the rest of the ticket Democrat.

Do individual votes, CHECK OVER YOUR BALLOT BEFORE YOU SUBMIT. Don’t exit out and try to start over, you aren’t allowed, your vote will be nulled. Get a poll worker to help you and have THEM document any machine errors, don’t take a pic of your ballot. Get a receipt of your vote. Ask poll workers how they are backing up votes. If you vote by mail, it’s critical to get your ballot in the mail asap. Thousands of votes aren’t counted because they’re stamped too late.

If you’re voting in person, go over every choice in the ballot carefully, and double check that the machine hasn’t changed your choice BEFORE you hit submit. Take your time, even if there’s a long line outside. Ask poll people for help if you have any questions. THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS.

Sometimes I have to ask really basic questions over and over and over before I understand stuff. I never forget, once it’s in my head, but some stuff takes clarifying and reclarifying and re-re-clarifying. I have learned to tell people that I’m not trying to be obtuse or difficult, that I have ADHD and I have to ask and re-ask. I don’t love sharing that with strangers, but it’s the most effective approach (I’ve tried a lot of different coping and learning methods over the years, including “I’d rather people think I’m stupid or sullen or contrary, I’ll be damned if I tell them that I process stuff differently”). But now I repeat back what they said to me, and they say, yup, that’s right, and then usually I say, I have ADHD, so I need to run this by you again to make sure I’m on the same page as you, and I ask some more questions, and 99% of the time they’re cool with it, and help me till I understand. A few people go from thinking I’m contrary to thinking I’m dumb, you can see it in their faces after I explain, but 1. Who cares, I need to understand, so they need to help me, and 2. I don’t think other people are dumb when they don’t notice all the things I see, from subtext to prediction to whatever. There are a lot of ways to be a person. I’m pretty secure with my level of intelligence, and I don’t look down on non-ADHD brains ffs, and 3. This is a small, but important aspect of disability and accessibility. If I told them I had dyslexia, people would be more patient with me re-stating and re-questioning. If I had other disabilities, they would be legally required to assist me or make the process accessible to me.

Everyone gets a seat at the table.

Everyone gets a vote.

Ask for help if you need it, is what I’m saying here.

More info here. TL;DR – voting in Texas is an absolute clusterfuck that suppresses voter turnout in just about every aspect.

https://www.gq.com/story/texas-voting-machines-cruz-orourke

This is NOT just a Texas thing. It’s happening all over with eSlate machines. They’ve been a problem for years. Please double and triple check your vote before you cast it.

lennythereviewer:

nightf4iry:

raeloganthesonic06fangirl:

asksapphirejewel:

pembrokewkorgi:

@ihatejonarbuckle

@raeloganthesonic06fangirl

Well, I mean, Garfield does care

Anyone who’s ever owned a cat knows that they have thier own ways to show they love you

An often overlooked thing about Garfield is between the snark and schemes, he’s really a loving kitty

I guess these aren’t as memorable as the wackier strips

But Jon can always count on Garfield to make him smile when it really matters

And Garfield knows that Jon cares

I swear, my cat is the same way, the below picture is an accurate portrait of how it is to have a dog and cat the same time.

Theory accepted

wholesome

It’s rare to see Garfield content on Tumblr that isn’t “Jon is a heartless monster” or “Garfield is some eldritch horror”

Guys, Jon’s a cartoonist who works from home. And we know why Garfield hates Mondays – because every Monday something bad happens to him (ex. Normal visits, his food blows up on him, he has to start a diet, he falls and hurts himself, etc.) so we don’t need to theorize why. I know its something of a common joke to wonder why he hates Mondays, but if you read a lot of Garfield it’s not a mystery.

hansbekhart:

enoughtohold:

if you’re considering not voting because you don’t like the democrats, i sympathize. they are not so inspiring.

but races for elected office are not all that’s on the ballot. there are also ballot measures, where you get to vote directly on the law.

consider taking a minute and looking up this year’s ballot measures for your state. there may be some that would directly help, or directly harm, your community.

to give just a few examples:

  • in Alabama, Amendment 2 would restrict abortion rights, completely banning it if Roe v. Wade is overturned, which is now likely.
  • in Arkansas, Issue 2 would disenfranchise voters by enshrining the state’s existing photo ID requirement in the state constitution. 
  • in Florida, Amendment 5 would make it much harder to raise taxes.
  • in Louisiana, Amendment 1 would ban people with felony records who’ve served their time from running for office for 5 years, even if their offense was just e.g. marijuana possession.
  • in North Carolina, the Income Tax Cap Amendment would cap income taxes, and the Voter ID Amendment would disenfranchise voters by requiring photo ID. 
  • in Oregon, Measure 105 would repeal its sanctuary state law protecting immigrants, and Measure 106 would restrict abortion rights by banning public funds from being spent on abortions.
  • in West Virginia, Amendment 1 would completely ban abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned, which is now likely.

meanwhile, on the brighter side:

  • in Arizona, Proposition 127 would require renewable energy.
  • in ArkansasIssue 5 would raise the minimum wage to $11.
  • in California, Prop 2 would fund housing for the homeless, and Prop 10 would allow local rent control.
  • in Colorado, Amendment A would fucking ban slavery as punishment for a crime. (yes, that’s a real thing.) Amendments Y and Z would hopefully limit gerrymandering. Amendment 73 would tax the rich to pay for education. Proposition 111 would crack down on predatory payday loans.
  • in Florida, Amendment 4 would restore voting rights to people with felony records who’ve served their time, and Amendment 9 would ban offshore drilling (and also vaping in the workplace, because Florida is weird).
  • in Idaho, Proposition 2 would expand Medicaid eligibility.
  • in Louisiana, Amendment 2 would repeal a Jim Crow–era law that aimed to “increase the supply of free prison labor and nullify the voting power of black jurors” by making it possible to convict someone of a felony without a unanimous jury.
  • in Maine, Question 1 would fund a universal home-care program for disabled people and older adults.
  • in Maryland, Question 2 would allow election-day voter registration.
  • in Massachusetts, Question 3 would protect the state’s transgender anti-discrimination law which is under attack. (it’s not good that this question is on the ballot, but you do need to vote YES on it.)
  • in Michigan, Proposal 1 would legalize recreational marijuana, and Proposal 3 would strengthen voting rights by instituting automatic voter registration, expanding absentee voting, pushing back deadlines, and more.
  • in Missouri, Amendment 2, Amendment 3, and Proposition C would all legalize medical marijuana (but they’d tax it different amounts and use the taxes for different things — you be the judge). Amendment 1 would make reforms to lobbying, campaign finance, and redistricting, and Proposition B would raise the minimum wage to $12.
  • in Montana, I-185 would expand Medicaid eligibility.
  • in Nebraska, Initiative 427 would expand Medicaid eligibility.
  • in Nevada, Question 5 would allow automatic voter registration, and Question 6 would require renewable energy.
  • in North Dakota, Measure 3 would legalize recreational marijuana and expunge existing marijuana convictions.
  • in Ohio, Issue 1 would downgrade drug possession offenses from felonies to misdemeanors and provide for some criminal justice reforms.
  • in Utah, Proposition 2 would legalize medical marijuana, and Proposition 3 would expand Medicaid eligibility.
  • in Washington, Initiative 940 would train cops not to murder people, and Initiative 1631 would charge polluters a fee on carbon emissions and fund environmental programs.

the outcomes of these and other important initiatives will be determined at the ballot box. you can make a direct impact on these issues in your state by doing your research and voting.

can’t vote? search for an organization supporting (or opposing) the initiative you care about, and consider donating your time or money to help them out. even just letting your friends and family know about it can help.

(please note that i’m not an expert on all of these initiatives. you may conclude for example that one of them sounds good, but isn’t implemented well so you can’t support it. that’s fine! but now you know what’s going on in your state and can have your say, and that’s a good thing.)

Please vote!

ballot ready and ballotpedia are both helpful in this regard.